The example was an example, a hypothetical situation that was used in my discussion
Thank you for this clarification JR.....I had thought that was the case when you said it was 'an example', but when you then continued on to say 'the ama
is suggesting at this level.....' I got kinda confused as to what was fact and what was hypothetical musing. I completely agree, I don't see why the ama
wouldn't do what was in the best interests of their membership (though I guess even that point is sometimes in doubt by some). That is usually what an org. is all about. And, in the process, if it works out that what they want isn't the best thing for others, then I guess so be it. If there's a problem....then the others should start their
own lobby group!!
I understand that the ama was approached about these subjects, never questioned that. I was just wondering now that this has occured, if the ama was actively seeking these conditions from said agencies. I also understand that you are not an 'expert', I just have come to value yours and various others input on situations such as these.[8D]
As far as laws, it's my impression that Homeland Security can pretty much do as they please. That impression may be in error.
I don't think there is any error here my friend.....sadly. But I wonder what they may do if the ama is whispering certain things in their ear.[:-]
Thanx for the reply.
Brian