Originally Posted by
DaveyMo
Recycled Flyer
My apologies to you and George for having put you both at loggerheads. Your point and his counterpoint have made a fascinating discussion, and I've picked up a lot more knowledge as a result. Accordingly, you both have my gratitude!
Now by your lights, the 9x6 is too aggressive. In reviewing this thread, I think it was Warren who suggested an 8x4. Is this what you would have in mind?
Thanks again.
Dave Mo
Hey Dave,
its all good here and honestly these things are hard to prove in the real world.
But I do think that a 2.5cc engine that thrives at 22,000 rpm would not like the load of a 9x6..........ever.
8x4 sounds good.
Cheers.