Originally Posted by
airraptor
BP so you tell the guy to not build it by the plans a totally redesign it???
........
Well, consider that he didn't correctly follow the plans in the first place.
The drawing clearly shows a thicker 6mm foam for the lower surface, a foam filler and tube spar and a THINNER 3mm top surface. The use of the thinner foam would have generated an airfoil that was closer to the original intent than the arc like shape he got by using the same thickness for both top and bottom.