RCU Forums - View Single Post - FAAs new rules interpretation
View Single Post
Old 06-30-2014 | 10:38 AM
  #99  
mr_matt's Avatar
mr_matt
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Oak Park, CA,
Default

Originally Posted by ledd4u
Agree with above statement. What I read dictates and upholds the current rules about flying near an airport. At Florida Jets, this policy exists and works excellent. We have had no problems with the local airport or the FAA ATC. As far as I am concerned it has to do with the UAV which I care nothing about.
Better be careful there with that ATC at Florida Jets. An AMA member in Kansas just reported this on the AMA forum:

Up until Monday, 6/23, we were able to fly under our written agreement with the FBO manager in an area that is listed on both the sectional and NOTAMs, now, way this new rule is interpreted by one FBO manager, we need to get prior authorization for EACH FLIGHT and have means to announce our intent, depart, and approach. This same manager says we need to get Sportsman ratings if we want to continue to fly.