RCU Forums - View Single Post - FAA Issues "Interpretation of the special rule for model aircraft"
Old 07-18-2014, 03:24 PM
  #490  
bradpaul
 
bradpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Apopka, FL
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This was what I found very interesting in the court decision:

Today's decision shouldn't be too surprising—in its own argument in the case, theFAA said that pilots should ignore its orders because they aren't actually orders in a roundabout attempt to get the case thrown out in order to keep drones in legal limbo.

In addition did anybody else notice that in the FAA document that cj posted :

I. ANY OTHER SITUATION THAT MAY INDICATE A SUSPICIOUS AIRCRAFT, INCLUDING ANY REPORTED OR OBSERVED UNAUTHORIZED UNMANNED AIRCRAFT ACTIVITY OR REMOTE CONTROLLED MODEL AIRCRAFT THAT DEVIATE FROM NORMAL PRACTICE AREAS/FLIGHT ACTIVITIES OR WOULD BE CONSIDERED SUSPICIOUS OR A SAFETY HAZARD.

REFERENCE- ADVISORY CIRCULAR 91-57 MODEL AIRCRAFT OPERATING STANDARDS.
AC 91-57 which is an ADVISORY and not their own "Interpretative Rule" ????????????????????????????

Last edited by bradpaul; 07-18-2014 at 03:29 PM.