RCU Forums - View Single Post - Another "Drone" incident in the news... , mostlikely non AMA member
Old 09-16-2014, 07:20 AM
  #290  
init4fun
 
init4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,359
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sport_Pilot
Well without defining VLOS it means you can fly the plane to the next galaxy if you keep an unbroken visual line of sight. The AMA defined what they meant by VLOS but Congress did not. But then they said to follow CBO rules, but the FAA says that this means that a spotter can not be used for FPV. So if they are not using CBO rules you go by what Congress said and then you can fly as far as you want as long as that imaginary line is not broken.

Hi Sport ,

Courts are full of Lawyers arguing "the intent of the law" every day . With this law , were it to be broken on a level requiring court involvement , you can bet that the first thing to be laid out would be that "Visual line of sight" is intended to mean that you can actually SEE the model your supposedly controlling , hence the redundant use of "visual" and "sight" . There is no jury in the US , even in light of the OJ verdict , that would believe in your "next galaxy" definition of VLOS .