RCU Forums - View Single Post - a sticky wicket, indeed
View Single Post
Old 10-13-2014 | 05:27 AM
  #43  
bradpaul's Avatar
bradpaul
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Apopka, FL
Default

Originally Posted by JohnShe
Actually, it is irrelevant. EAA type flyers must meet all relevant FAA regulations. They don't need a CBO for that. The EAA provides other services to promote recreational and experimental full scale aviation and home built type full scale aircraft.'
Glad to see that you recognize that your post #36 was irrelevant!

The CBO concept was invented solely for section 336 to describe a generic entity for model aviation. It is the responsibility of the AMA to fill the role of a CBO in order to satisfy the intent of section 336.
Just as I thought "wishful thinking" We now have both the "FAA" and the "JohnShe" Interpretation of Sec 336................................. Of course what actually will matter in the eventual result of the lawsuit filed by the AMA and other parties.