Originally Posted by
JohnShe
Yes, we need to keep in mind that there is no OFFICIAL recognition of any group as a CBO. But, there have been a couple of feeble hints from the FAA. One is in the interpretation rule where they acknowledge the FPV policy of an unspecified CBO. The other is a direct link to the AMA in their ;
"What Can I Do With My Model Aircraft? Hobby/Recreational Flying"
webpage.
http://www.faa.gov/uas/publications/...aft_operators/
I do believe that language in the interpretation rule specifically admits that we will be free of FAA sUAS regulation if we meet the conditions of section 336. That means there has to be a CBO and that the FAA recognizes it. Again, I think the AMA threw a monkey wrench into the works with their ill advised suit. They should have negotiated an agreement.
As I posted in another thread the FAA and the AMA are playing "chicken". The FAA won't recognize and the AMA won't declare.................... Why that is, I would speculate that the AMA has been given guidance by the lawyers and insurance companies.
The AMA should declare in support of model aviation, they ARE A NATIONWIDE COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATION and if you adhere to the "programming" (term from the law) of the AMA and the other provisions of the law, that Sec 336 exempts you from further FAA regulation. PUT THE BALL IN THE FAA's COURT TO SAY OTHERWISE!!!!!!