RCU Forums - View Single Post - How about this?!!!!
View Single Post
Old 11-03-2014 | 05:33 AM
  #83  
phlpsfrnk's Avatar
phlpsfrnk
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Spring Hill, FL
Default

Originally Posted by init4fun
Mr. grimmace may be thinking of the "old" doc. 550 ?

Just to bring Mr. grimmace and others up to speed here ;

The AMA states in Document #550 , Paragraph 3 "operations - requirements - limitations" Subtitle e)

"During an FPV flight , the FPV spotter must be prepared to acquire the transmitter/control from the FPV pilot and assume VLOS control of the model aircraft at any time safe operation of the flight is in question"

In other words , the AMA has the Pilot and spotter playing "pass the transmitter" during the very moment the flight is at it's most need of corrective inputs . Ever seen the results of a Newb tryin to hand off the TX to the instructor when a normal non FPV training flight goes awry ?

To the AMA's credit , Paragraph 3 section a) DOES mandate "FPV novice pilots undergoing training at low altitude must use a buddy box system with an FPV spotter , or must go to a safer altitude if no buddy box system is used "

So even in the case of a newb FPV pilot , if you've got altitude on your side , to hell with the buddy box alltogether .

Try this , take a model airplane , FPV equipped or not , to a "safer altitude" and aim it straight at the ground . Now hand off the TX to the person next to you , and see if he can save the model .

Wanna bet the ground wins the battle of the seconds past as control is re established ?????
I agree, the old (simple) 550.pdf had it right. Currently, as written I would not personally want the responsibility of "spotter" for FPV (novice or otherwise) without positive (buddy-box) control of the aircraft. Under the current rules if the handoff is fumbled who is responsible if damage and/or injury occurs?

Frank