RCU Forums - View Single Post - How about this?!!!!
View Single Post
Old 11-07-2014 | 11:24 AM
  #163  
vertical grimmace's Avatar
vertical grimmace
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,277
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
From: Greeley, CO
Default

Originally Posted by JohnAsaPrice
I live in Raleigh NC. I recently observed an FPV pilot with a large (6-foot wingspan) home-built flying wing.
He was flying with non-standard frequency equipment so he could get long-range control and video feedback.
He took off from a large field that was less than 1 mile from a maximum security prison.
He proceeded to fly up to 1500 feet and traveled 1-2 miles from launch site. He was well beyond line-of-site.

He flew over: Local TV Studio with very active helipad, a maximum Security Prison, three different universities (classes in session, large pedestrian population), etc...
He may have also been within the boundaries of our international airport (RDU).

This particular airspace has pretty high, low-altitude traffic including helicopters for medical, national guard and news choppers of various classes.

An FPV aircraft has very little peripheral vision, the pilot has practically no awareness of the airspace around his ship. It is hard to detect and avoid potential collisions with other aircraft. An FPV aircraft is unable to operate by standard VFR rules, and thus is a practically undetectable airspace hazard.

The electric motor and Lipo Batteries can be potentially ingested by turbine engines where they can do significant damage.

This community of hobbyists really needs to seriously consider the risks to others that they are causing by not following AMA guidelines. this is especially true in high-density areas such as Raleigh.
I have seen just such equipment flying at my field. The pilot did not care at all about any rules.

I went back and read an article in the June 2014 of MA. It speaks of full scale flight rules and how our models (line of sight) are essentially VFR. These FPV's are not only NOT VFR, but they are not even IFR really. Not being 100% present with the aircraft, collision avoidance would be very tough.

Again, if the general public is left to perceive that traditional line of sight flying is not completely different than FPV flying, we are doomed. The AMA embracing FPV is not going to help.