I see your point but I think that by tying it into the club/ama/imaa requirements they are also put into the position of enforcing/regulating it. Not to mention that by having the agreement of $1000 it really opens the door for legal action as there's a cut and dry contract now. If it "It all comes down to the two parties involved in the end" then there really shouldn't need to be a waiver in the first place. I know it's extreme but if there's a 'no fault' policy at the field, period, then there's never anything expected reguardless and nothing to sue about! It really comes back to the principal that has been quoted so much "If you can't afford to wreck it then....."