RCU Forums - View Single Post - BY LAWS change request
View Single Post
Old 01-03-2015 | 09:09 PM
  #6  
Hossfly's Avatar
Hossfly
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,130
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: New Caney, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mongo
got a not today from HQ.
they have the by laws revision as ordered in 2013 finished and ready to send to the Leader Members for acceptance.
however, they want us LM folks to approve a quick change to the existing by laws to allow for electronic or fax delivery of the proposed changes to us.
i voted NO.
my feeling is that too many of us just vote ok without reading the changes as it is, and maybe just a few might actually read what they are sent if it is actually sent to them by mail.
what you think, Hoss?
What happened to my early response? Of course I am against any form of electronic methods of vote-counting, especially when certain groups do the counts. Look what George Soros did with the presidential election 2+ years ago using his voting machine built in Spain. AMA just counted the EVP vote by using the employees to count the vote. Who's going to challenge the big boys that certainly wanted the incumbent to win. I don't trust anyone in these days of elections. AMA announced the winners a week before the date they set for said announcement. I well remember when I was left off the ballot for my second term. Unfortunately the AMA President, Earl Witt was treated same. Write -in votes were hidden by AMA Staff. Earl came in, found the write -in votes, forced the current Ex. Director to have them counted and I was re-elected by WRITE-IN. Earl just missed by a few votes.
The AMA Hired Staff can do as they darn well please. Since Earl and I left the AMA EX. Council, AMA has, in My Opinion, withered in gross garbage as far as really working for the aero-modeling public. AMA has an opportunity to obtain a world of new prospects, but they simply leave a gross amount of what I consider "garbage" in charge of that which is really needed for moving Model Aviation to the level that is deserved by the sport-hobby, while the membership allows the elected people take away all that is needed, and required.
While membership avoids taking charge, then those in charge will BE IN CHARGE.

I'm certain that I answered Mongo's above question soon after he published it. What happened to it?