RCU Forums - View Single Post - Composite 2.6 vs 3.0
View Single Post
Old 10-12-2003 | 02:53 PM
  #8  
Shortman's Avatar
Shortman
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,966
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, Oregon
Default RE: Composite 2.6 vs 3.0

Knowing that they are very similiar its just whether you want a 35% or 40%. Most of us would go with a 3.0M or 40% Extra because it flys bigger. More stable in manuevers. Both are great flying planes, its just a toss up of what you want.

www.cafreestyle.com has some pictures of another friend who has the 3.0M Fiberclassics Jason Shulman Peel Back Scheme with a DA 150. Its an absolute monster and flys wonderful. Between these 2 planes its the pilot that will make the difference.