Originally Posted by
cj_rumley
Thanks. Your non-answer is a sufficient answer.
Your question has no bearing on the definition of a CBO as it applies to P.L. 112-95. That is the answer to your question. AMA could say their mission is bunny rabbits and rainbows and it does not change how Congress defined what a CBO is. My question is why are you attempting to divert the conversation away from the clear and irrefutable fact that COngress clearly intends that a person must be a member of a CBO in order to be "within" the programming.