[QUOTE=acdii;12007008]What we have here is a stepping stone to idiocy. It will be no different than those morons who call a semi automatic rifle with a banana mag an assault rifle. Get enough of people flying these in areas not designated for flying RC, and eventually they will get a bad rap, and trickle down, it will start to affect all of us who do follow the AMA guidelines. All it is going to take to cause major issues with RC is some jerk fly one of these into a jet engine and cause it to crash, whether it was intentional or just a stupid move, will not matter, it will cause repercussions that will affect us.
Put a frog in hot water, it will jump out, but put that frog in warm water and heat it up, it will cook. Those who ignore what this is about will be that frog in warm water with a fire under it.[/QUOTE]
acdii:
This is the most Intelligent thing said here on RCU in a long time. If we find fault with every thing every one else says here or in any form we are just defeating the purpose of belonging to a CBO/AMA whether U agree with said CBO/AMA or not. Together we can, hopefully at least, persuade the FAA to modify the NPRM to reflect what the AMA and Congress intended not what the FAA has professed in their interpretation of #336.
So now I'm back on the soap box so Go Comment to the NPRM only 33 days left. Get your Family and friends to comment too.