Originally Posted by
ira d
If we got rid of automobiles we could eliminate all problems associated with them such as drunk driving and hit and run incidents, But to get rid autos would be unreasonable and create far more problems than it would solve. The same is true for anything be it model aviation or otherwise no matter how many restrictions you may come up with there will still be risks. There has to be balance between what is reasonable and what will enhance safety and more restrictions, and there will always be disagreements on what should be done but in general if rules from a common sense point of view are too unreasonable they will largely be ignored and sometimes have a opposite effect than intended.
I just checked my posts and not once did I advocate banning anything. I advocated geographic and altitude restrictions on sUAS flying (in any form) that keeps them clear of the overwhelming majority of manned aircraft. Just today, US Senator Chuck Schumer is quoted in USA Today that the near miss yesterday in New York "should be a wake-up call for stricter limits on drone use."
I humbly submit that we can either do it ourselves (hard altitude and geographic limits) and retain some control over the outcome, or the legislators will do it for us.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...anes/28207569/