Originally Posted by
littlecrankshaf
Hmmm... the county seemed to pretty much reaffirm something that was a given...well, unless there was previous anti drone legislation in place, which I doubt. Just can't help but wonder what caused the county to even consider the issue, especially based on the response... Oh well, I can only guess you and your club are still anti-FPV though?? It would have been a very dark day indeed if the county had taken such stance as you, and by extension your club, since the most appropriate place to fly FPV refuses to allow the activity... Oh well, maybe you'll have better luck next time...
Hmm... I think your assumption is not necessarily correct. His club may not be anti-FPV if the users stay VLOS. VLOS does NOT preclude FPV. They are different terms - one is the way the flight is being made (FPV) and the other is where (VLOS). Or has someone changed the definitions and I am too stupid and missed it? Wouldn't that be a batch!