RCU Forums - View Single Post - Another Drone Pilot does it Again
View Single Post
Old 07-15-2015, 05:22 AM
  #2037  
init4fun
 
init4fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,359
Received 49 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bruceal
I follow these threads and throw in a comment from time to time. My county just passed "drone" legislation, and as the president of a club I made it my point to get involved. The law that was passed says: A person may fly on his property, another persons property with permission and a public park if permission is given. Now my club flies on a closed landfill with permission from the Town. So we are ok, the same with the one other club in the county.

When this legislation came about, I met with the legislator along with a representative from the other club and our AMA District VP. We pretty much left the meeting leaving the legislator more educated about model aviation. My club puts on an annual air show for the public with assistance from the Town. They provide free food and advertising for us. The legislator is familiar with this event and we quickly made him aware that we are not the people flying next to people's windows and taking pictures among other things. As the public meetings progressed I realized that I needed to reach out to the lawmakers and get them to see the difference between us and the "drone" users. The lawmaker that wrote the bill became a big help to us as he always mentioned our air show at the public hearings.

This is what I believe we must do, get people out to the fields and educate them. I think that the whole "drone" thing will continue to do damage to itself with countless acts of recklessness. Bring the public out and show them that we fly VLOS. Put them on a buddy box and let them enjoy flying for themselves, make friends with the public!
Originally Posted by littlecrankshaf
Hmmm... the county seemed to pretty much reaffirm something that was a given...well, unless there was previous anti drone legislation in place, which I doubt. Just can't help but wonder what caused the county to even consider the issue, especially based on the response... Oh well, I can only guess you and your club are still anti-FPV though?? It would have been a very dark day indeed if the county had taken such stance as you, and by extension your club, since the most appropriate place to fly FPV refuses to allow the activity... Oh well, maybe you'll have better luck next time...

And again , you folks are using "drone" and "FPV" interchangeably , so which is it that your against ; AMA #550 legal FPV (which causes us no problems) or unrestricted drone use ?

Fly FPV under ALL auspices of AMA #550 and you should have the hobby's blessing .......

Fly unrestricted drone missions over populated areas & such and you ARE the problem .........

So tell me , again , exactly which it is that you all are talking about ? Cause I thought we were talking about the unrestricted drone rather than the condoned #550 legit FPV ?????