Originally Posted by
N1EDM
Thanks! I wonder what was the attraction for a 3-cylinder radial when the stock 4-cylinder engine produced 65HP... Did miss some part of an explanation back there???
Thanks,
Bob
What I have read is the 50 HP radial performed almost as well as the 65 but the 65 was smoother.
I have read nothing about the cost of the engines. Maybe price was an attraction for the radial.
Some original cubs were powered with a flat four of 40 HP.