Originally Posted by
Silent-AV8R
Fair enough, that one does have some commercial applications, but I think you know what I was getting at. But like the one above, it's easier to get a "thanks for playing" comment in rather than address the issue or answer the question. You conveniently didn't include the other pictures I added, wonder why? Hard to answer the question about "traditional RM modeling" when looking at them right?
How about this one.....traditional RC or no?