Originally Posted by
CARS II
Well, it has at least twice.
We are here now not to just ignore what's going on with, is it 46 degrees or is it 47 degrees, we are here to clarified once and for all what the heck with this different degrees.
We know now for sure that the RcXel sensors are useless and the solution is to replace the sensor with a CH Ignitions or with a RC Extreme Power sensors to get the 28 degrees that we are looking for.
I'm not going to be doing all this work to find once and for all what's going on here so I can be told to just forget it, no seņor, nope.
I'm one of those that wants to know how every wheel turns in a clock. I've been running my engines successfully for over thirty years because of my approach.
So, please don't come telling us to just leave a long.
Note.
Everyone is entire of his own opinion and sincerely respect your opinions and thank you for participating on this thread.
Cars ll
Please continue to pay close attention to details.
I have been using Rcxel sensors for years. Just like any company today they might have vendor problems. They are not "known to be useless". Known to be useless is a pretty hard phrase.
I have bought hall effect ICs sensors from electronics stores and made my own years ago. But lately I use those being discussed in this thread. The only problems I have had was with a batch of CRRC Pro sensors that the + and signal wires were crossed, lucky me that cost a handful of hair I couldn't afford.
You should know though that bcchi is the founder of C&H Ignitions and has been involved in the development of almost all the ignitions being discussed here.
Unless you have the ability to check the spark @ RPM this method of timing shows you the timing at full advance. Inside the module a calculation of low RPM retards the subsequent sparks until a RPM that changes the calculation is reached. My meaning here is that unless you see the running at 2000 rpm timing at 4 degrees and the 8000 rpm at 46 degrees (see edit note) the timing that you see in a single slow counterclockwise rotation may be misleading. I no longer have an Oscilloscope to check these points.
I believe this thread maybe going on to long for a sticky unless more technical data is added so that no misinformation is presented that might permanently damage one company.
My .02