Tim,
First of all those numbers do not make sense. We can turn both the TT and the EVO at or over 17K with a 9x6. Did you do your testing with a 10 or 11" prop?
Secondly, 200 RPM is not significant at all. 1000 RPM is.
Thirdly, static RPM testing with a flying prop is not the method that should be used to determine an engine's performance.
How does the EVO 46 unload compared to the TT?
I wish that someone would have asked for some input from the people that offered the EVO .46 as a solution before making statements about the engine's performance.
DK
Last edited by kane; 05-25-2016 at 10:15 AM.