Originally Posted by
Sport_Pilot
Actually I was arguing the same point as you. But after reading my policy, I could see an insurance company denying a claim on that basis.
On the insurance issue you haven't argued anything similar to my point. Claims and coverage get denied for a whole host of reasons, usually after a close review of a policy and a specific loss. In this particular case you've continued to indicate your carrier is not affording coverage for your RC planes because of an FAA definition of them. With 99.99% certainly this just did not happen. If you want to scan a copy of the language of your policy, I'm sure it would clear the issue up. But to continue to say this happened is either a disservice to others here, or you have the only company in the world who is taking this position. As I indicated previously, if that's the case, you should be lead plaintiff in a class action. Big bucks!