I don't agree with you either. Are you planning on buying this jet?? If not what's the problem? Apperantly this gentleman is a highly skilled composite worker who does this for a living building UAV's and understands the stress these airframes go through. If the company he works for trusts him why can't anyone else?
Originally Posted by
lavi rider
No disrespect here but plain elbow grease ,
ressurection of high G maneuvering models as such is much of a risk as no one can actually "see" beyond the surface of "non damaged areas " such as remaining wings etc' .
The risk involved might greatly influence everyone as any of the un detected structural damages though not seen can still exists as cracks in the structure ...
Fixing one of these and calling it a sucsses is no more than plainly luck at the best , others would call it lack of fully understanding the nature of physics .. Which might end in a catastrophic failure in flight leading to damage to property or even worse to other bystanders .... So , following those who call out to "Bin it " would actually the right way to go IMHO !