Originally Posted by
Hydro Junkie
I know BarracudaHockey says he's looking in to it(and yes, I'm taking him at his word on this) but, for what that is worth, I doubt anything will be done by the AMA. To actually take action is to admit there is a problem. To admit there is a problem means that the self-policing policy the AMA and it's minions(yes, I'm finger pointing at some people in the forums, though not naming names since we all know who they are) are so proud of is not working and essentially admitting as much. To admit that self policing isn't working means "loss of face" and credibility as an organization when dealing with the FAA and Congress which basically negates the need for the AMA as a CBO. Lastly, since most people's home owners insurance will cover what might happen if someone does crash while flying, would we really need to pay for additional insurance through the AMA?
Does this bring the situation into focus for anyone other than me? My statement is based on a logical progression of what taking any kind of action means to the AMA's "White House" in Indiana. I would now challenge the AMA "cheerstaff" into providing a rebuttal statement that address's this with verifiable information that can prove me wrong. Any of the usual "spinning" and double talk will not be accepted as verifiable proof, so don't even bother to try that worn out tactic. Verifiable proof MUST INCLUDE A WORKING LINK to show where the information comes from, not just a "he said she said" line of bull we've seen so often
What an absolute load...just more generalizations without so much as a shred of evidence. Love the challenge bit too, so predictable and self serving. If only you could set the rules of all debate and discussion, lol. As if any answer would suffice.
Just more of the same AMA=Bad narrative so prevalent and persistent, at least here, at least by a handful or so. From the same folks who love name calling, and titles (sheeple, fan boy, minions, and now cheerstaff). From the same folks who have no ability to see in any way other than FOR or AGAINST. What is the equivalent name or title to apply to the folks with a persistent seething cynical hatred for the AMA? A loathing that goes on for years and years.
What's the name Hydro...you're good with names and titles. What do you want to call those folks? Actually no answer needed, it's a hypothetical question. Namecalling and titles don't really belong in thread like this, but are often used when all else fails.
All great stuff from yet another "Brotherhood" member....very traditional. What a great hobby.
