Add San Diego to the list of municipalities taking actions against drones:
"FAA regulations require drone hobbyists to provide prior notification to airport and air traffic control officials before flying within five miles of an airfield. Operators are also supposed to keep the unmanned aircraft within sight at all times, yield to manned airplanes and stay within an altitude of 400 feet above ground level. The FAA report on San Diego encounters said many of the incidents took place at altitudes of 2,000 feet or higher....the law could serve as a model for other local jurisdictions, so that drone operators would have uniform rules instead of a patchwork between various cities."

http://timesofsandiego.com/politics/...rcement-rules/


Add New Mexico to the list of states taking action against drones (Senate Bill 167):
"A person, state agency or political subdivision of the state shall not use a drone or unmanned aircraft to conduct surveillance of a person or of property owned by a person, a farm or an agricultural operation without the consent of that person, property owner, farm or agricultural operation. [emphasis added]"
Where "Surveillance" is defined as : "the observation of a place, person, group or ongoing activity"

Would sure seem to make it illegal to do aerial photography, FPV etc. of or over people's property w/o their consent. "Observation" is a pretty broad term.

https://www.nmlegis.gov/Sessions/17%...ate/SB0167.pdf


Ok AMA Government Affairs...
You lost in Orlando and didn't even fight to defend the club in Pennsylvania - so let's see that "influence" you brag about in these cases!