Hi Joe,
I'm a little peeved too! I would like to know why AMA feels that it can dictate the content of another organization's web site. There was nothing in the document that was negative, libelous, inflammatory, etc toward the AMA, yet the JPO was "strongly urged" to remove it. If the AMA wants to deny a waiver to anyone copying the info, fine, but that doesn't give them the right to tell JPO to take the document out because some people are dumb enough to copy it verbatim on their exam. One of the most precious rights we have is that of free speech, and I think AMA was way out of bounds on this.
Also, if there is some positive sentiment about the jet community within AMA, publicize it! These guys at JPO are getting it from both sides! DB has no problem putting negative items in his column, why not at least once acknowledge the positive side of jets and the JPO's continuing efforts to make jets safe.
Jon