Originally Posted by
Flypast111
I am a “u-control line” model enthusiast and an owner of two (2) PAW TBR diesel engines, 0.19 & 0.40. I have successfully broken-in, or run-in, the 19 TBR, but I am having some difficulty with the 40 TBR engine. I have successfully run the following engine RUN-IN operations without using an electric starter;
19 TBR Engine:
a. ten (10) 2-oz. tanks of self-made diesel fuel through the 19 TBR without any major issue's
b. self-made diesel fuel formula: 30% John Deere ether starting fluid (part number RE556468; 80% ether & 20% alcohol), 30% castor/synthetic oil mix, 35% kerosene, 5% cetane boost … seems to work well … OK
c. followed supplied RUN-IN procedure and got good results … yeeaaahhh! … congratulations to PAW!
40 TBR Engine:
d. not so with the 40 TBR engine => in two different days of 3-5 hour duration events, I have only run about five (5) 2-oz. tanks through the 40 TBR engine … I also ran about two (2) short duration … maybe half-oz. … diesel fuel “start-slow run-stop” events as well … no other successful runs
e. in addition, however, I have experienced several low-cyclic motoring/firing resonance “back-&-forth” operation events ... which demonstrates that the engine is attempting to run, but will not “fully operate” per normal high-speed operation …. hhmmmnnnn!
f. also for note: the 40 TBR needle and venturi became “loose” during the initial RUN-IN and had to be tightened … the needle does not always demonstrate “stable” position control during engine firing …. sometimes it rotates +/- 30 degrees during operation … I removed the needle and “squeezed” the split-brass mount to reduce this behavior … it has helped ... but still the needle is not always fully “position-stable” … ???
Does any of this experience indicate to anyone just what is occurring here? Please advise further … I could use some help here to get this non-RC 40 TBR running “up-to” normal operations ... THANKS - Flypast111
PAW have been making mostly decent running engines now since the mid-1950's I believe. One would hope that by now they could have done something about their "agricultural" venturi and NVA setups. It's not that their engines are that cheap either. They could have bought and fitted proper NVAs from OS, ENYA, or the Eastern European suppliers (like other manufacturers), and everyone would be happy.