Originally Posted by
BarracudaHockey
As you have no proof it wasn't and those are some pretty outlandish claims.
Was I there? No.
Do I know how the elections are conducted? Yes.
But do you KNOW exactly what Rich did with the voting? We already know he showed a total lack of ethics by letting one candidate attack the other in the AMA's publication so that brings the vote itself into question. There's nothing outlandish about it since he's shown he can't be trusted to do things fairly or he wouldn't have let anyone post anything in the publication. That in and of itself is proof enough for me. Better still, it's in black and white so there's no disputing that Rich allowed it to happen