RCU Forums - View Single Post - ** Digitech Central Telemetric Unit for Jeti **
Old 09-09-2018, 07:00 PM
  #113  
Carsten Groen
 
Carsten Groen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,803
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ww2birds
Hi CTU fans. I just spent a few hours on the test stand with a Merlin 200XBL turbine (with the brushless/digital pump) connected to the CTU.

My goal was to find the correct fuel consumption calibration number (Pump Factor), which for this setup I estimate to be 46.

Details:

I had flown the CTU (and really like it!) and found the suggested pump factor of 200 to be reporting waaaay to little fuel consumption. With Gapsar's "Telemetry 1" adapter or his Flight Computer, he suggests a default of 200. Just as Sandor does. With the Xicoy Tele-1 and FC devices hooked to the 200XBL I found that the more correct number was 185-187 .. so the 200 setting was conservative .. so that is sensible.

Clearly something very different is going on with the CTU's calculation (which is just fine .. they never stated compatible fuel factors with the Gaspar units).

After several calibration runs (as outlined in the CTU's manual) I'd say that the correct pump factor for this motor on the CTU is approximately 46 (perhaps +/-2) .. it repeated on two calibration runs and reports not only the 1L "measured mile" correctly as in the manual, but it also gets the total fuel consumption within a few percent from before startup to after shutdown when compared to the weight change of the fuel tank. I used Sandor's 0.8Kg/L fuel density number.

I was using a BVM UAT, all 1/8" (3.2mm) ID tygon on the inlet side, the usual 4mm clear tubuing on the pump output, and a 3S LiFE ECU battery.

I would be curious if others have also determined similar factors. Perhaps it is very different for the old DC motors and the brushless digital pump?

Dave
Dave, glad you like the CTU
Regarding the pumpfactor (fuelfactor for projet/jetcat and AMT), the default values are all from testsetups of various engines. However, the pumpfactors will vary between engine types (within the same brand) and also between setups (restrictions, tube diameters etc) so there is nothing wrong with the value being (far) off from the default value. I have some numbers from different setups (primarily from local friends that have installed the CTU in different planes/engines) and will try and make a list of whats being used around the world.

BTW, there is nothing (whatsoever) similarity between what pumpfactors are being used in other products, the algorithm I use in the CTU is fine-tuned to give good results for all engines (so far) that we know of.
It even corrects the fuel consumption numbers from jetcats and projet even though they calculate the fuel consumption directly in the ECU. This however, is with a large error which the CTU can correct for (a couple of days ago a JetCat P200SX was corrected by 13% by the CTU to get the fuel consumption spot on. I'm not sure there are that many other telemetry units on the market that does this, and at the same time supports pretty much all engines available. Regarding "all engines", 3 more brands are now creeping into the CTU, one of them already done (awaiting more testing), the next two will enter the CTU codebase shortly
More info when they are done and tested!