RCU Forums - View Single Post - Growth: Whose responsiblity is it?
View Single Post
Old 03-23-2019 | 07:09 AM
  #115  
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,711
Received 204 Likes on 175 Posts
From: Happy Valley, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by Appowner
Where did you get the taxable income thing from? The FAA simply states, "Compensation".
From the FAA FAQs: What is the definition of recreational or hobby use of a UAS or drone?
Recreational or hobby UAS or drone use is flying for enjoyment and not for work, business purposes, or for compensation or hire.

In theory, your local hobby shop gives you an engine in return for you displaying their name on your plane. You have been "Compensated" by any definition in the tax code and business law. In theory you take a picture with your drone and give it to your neighbor and they give you a beer for your effort, YOU have been Compensated.

Now, imagine you use an OS engine you paid for. And you stick one of their OS stickers on your plane next to the engine. FAA pays a visit to a contest and asks for your 107 cert. You don't have one. But he says, you have a sponsor. That OS sticker proves it. But 'NO' you say. They didn't pay you anything. "Prove it!"

It is, as the Brits might say, a Sticky Wicket. So let me ask this, has anyone here asked the FAA about this situation? Anyone? Beuller? Beuller?



BTW, I asked but haven't got a response yet.
I agree that there is a fine line there but honestly there are the " what ifs" and then there is reality. If one is to be charged with any crime in this country they must be proven guilty. The FAA is not going to be prosecuting anyone. If it goes beyond issuing a fine, They are going to submit charges to the District Attorney of the county in which the alleged violation took place. The District Attorney in cooperation with an FAA counsel will determine whether or not to follow through on prosecution or not. They will pre determine if they have enough evidence to win the case or not. They have to prove that the pilot was given the equipment as compensation. If money changed hands, they would have to prove it was for compensation and not reimbursement for the pilots expenses.

The other reality is that virtually nobody gets anything for free. As I have stated, sponsored pilots still pay a discounted price for their equipment. As I have said before, there is just not enough money in this hobby to give guys free rides and pay them to fly your products.