Originally Posted by
speedracerntrixie
PL115-254 section 349 has not been fully implemented because the FAA has not made all 8 conditions accessible to recreational users, example the required test. When it is possible to meet all the requirements I will do so and comply.
Of course this has been explained to you multiple times on RCG hasn't it?
Thinking on this a bit more:
Is it your position that the FAA is telling us to obey what we can while they sort out the rest? Of course this is going to be a priority while undergoing an FBI investigation and working with Boeing to get the Max 8/9 back in the air.
Then again if you have any reports of the FAA citing guys for breaking altitude limits I will gladly concede.
Well, I'll hopefully find out soon. Today I sent the FAA a yes/no question asking if it was legal to fly recreationally above 400 feet from a non-towered airport in class G. I suspect the answer will be no, citing the FAA Authorization in post #1 as the necessary document in lieu of a regulation.