Originally Posted by
mach5nchimchim
yeah, but he thinks he's the omnipotent end all be all when it comes to USA aerospace regulations or future regulations.
Well...
When AMA was saying language of 336 required membership, who was it that got FAA to issue statement that they did not interpret 336 as requiring membership?
And when AMA submitted comments recommending use of AMA number in lieu of registration number, who's comments were quoted not once but twice in FAA's justification for NOT doing that?
And when the latest FAA authorization was up for renewal, who was it that got his Congressman to change a critical "and" to an "or" in imfamous "programming" statement in the recreational exception?
And now, when AMA is pushing the FRIA idea as yet another way compel membership, who is it that has been joined by DJI in noting legal issues with that part of the proposed rule?