Originally Posted by
R_Strowe
NOWHERE did Barracuda say that. 91.13 has NOTHING to do with NOTAMS or TFRs.
What that drone pilot did was irresponsible, reckless and certainly a violation of 91.13.
And RID would have stopped him how, again? Last I checked, a NOTAM was not a condition under the NPRM to shut down airspace. And a TFR was not filed.
R_Strowe
Not sure what your point is. You can't park a drone in the path of an aircraft, TFR, NOTAM, or otherwise.
As for remote ID, the majority of casual flyers will not fly if it's illegal to take off. This guy is exactly the type of
flyer remote ID would stop. He isn't a criminal or a skate punk, he own a property management company.
He also has a lot of guys like you and BarracudaHockey trying to minimize what he did by throwing out red
herrings about what the FAA did or didn't do. All that nonsense stops with remote ID.