Here, I'll ask two questions...
Does anyone else think the AMA's NATS push has an air of desperation about it? I submit the following as evidence:
- Extended deadline
- No fees for first timers (i.e. not enough repeats to make it profitable)
- Major host groups cancelled participation, but AMA says (paraphrased) "not cancelling the events themselves"
What happens to AMA if NPRM gets published largely as written? ... Do they take a more engaged role in clubs, perhaps buying much more sites outright, if nothing else to preserve flying sites?