Originally Posted by
speedracerntrixie
Agreed. IMO nothing worse then an ARF assembly peice that doesn't mention the covering wrinkles, fit issues and then ends with " it only took a couple clicks of trim to fly perfectly ". Just tells me the author either got paid to do a fluff peice or hasn't a clue.
I agree. I'm utterly sick of reading their "puff piece" evaluations. They're nothing but paid advertisements. I want to see them reviewed by rank and file modelers, flown off WELL LESS than perfect fields, NOT off groomed grass, etc. In other words, real world evals not perfect world evals. In the flight test community, doing "perfect world" evals is a huge no-no. Everything is evaluated from perspective of Mark 1, Mod 0, pilot.