Originally Posted by
ECHO24
Seriously? Hanson put it out in black and white in The Hill, a nation publication, CALLING ON CONGRESS TO MAKE IT A LAW, and Hanson repeated
it the following month in his column in Model Aviation. The claim that membership in AMA was required for compliance with the law was also repeated
numerous times by AMA spokespeople in videos posted here by Franklin.
And all of this I'm sure you are well aware. So I don't know what's up with this other than playing some kind of game trolling Franklin.
In that article this is the only mention of Congress.
Congress wants to increase the safety of our skies, they should help recreational drone pilots understand that they need to comply with Part 107. Congress should also task the FAA with increasing enforcement so that those who violate Part 107 are held accountable for their actions.
Here is the link to the entire peice. https://thehill.com/opinion/technolo...rule-followers
Once again, this was Hanson misunderstanding that " within the programming " meant being a member and if you weren't a member you needed to hold a part 107 cert. There is nothing there that indicates that Hanson tried to force the FAA into stating that membership was a requirement of flying under 336. Make no mistake, I have no love for Hanson and had hopes that he would not get re elected.