How is it deflection it’s a simple observation from outside? The same dozen or so dissatisfied people some who are members some who are not complaining but failing to do anything that might have any actual value in solving the problems of the AMA. Sending a tersely worded email or letter isn’t of particular value as it’s easily ignored.

It doesn’t mater if “I” think they are doing a good job it’s the membership’s opinion. Of course if you’re not a member your opinion doesn’t mean squat. If you are a member and you really believe there is a better way the only way to make change is from within. You will have to convince a majority of those who have the power of the vote to support your changes.

As it stands the AMA is the only CBO representing its membership. You have two choices one to change it from the inside or failing that start a new CBO.

My CBO is doing just fine we are able to fly as we always have with an exemption from the regulations. All others have to follow the stricter rules including licensing. I can even fly anywhere in the USA as negotiated under the reciprocal agreement.



I had a private access internet gateway and my own private computer at work at no time did anyone but I post using that gateway. It was read by others strictly for its entertainment value no input by others. Many many times the computer was logged on to RCC among others but I was busy doing other things. Lots of entertainment on the web you guys were a minor distraction believe me. Have been on vacation for some time retirement officially starts Sept 1. Getting the truck, camper and trailer ready to head out so even now I may be logged on but not actively participating. You guys are just not that interesting.



This is not a criticism of Franklin but read his profile it states:

“Tireless advocate for ALL recreational sUAS operators regardless of CBO membership status, disciplined operations, and compliance with law and regulation.”
​​​​​​​Perhaps the AMA should have concentrated on the needs of members only and let the others fend for themselves not attempt to be all things to everyone.



MAAC membership only 12,000 strong didn’t fight with, threaten or attempt to force any government agency to bend to its will. Instead they urged us to wait until the rules were in place then we would apply for an exemption for the members. Citing our 70 year safety record and cooperation with Transport Canada MAAC was granted an exemption and we continue to fly as we always have. None members have height restrictions 400 ft same as you, even licensing over a few lbs and restrictions on airspace. Our members enjoy fields on active airport property, jet and other events held on airports with NOTAMS for the length of the event. Several clubs operate on or near military airports or bases.

From the beginning the MAAC directors and membership wanted nothing to do with regulating/taking respocibility for anyone flying outside the organization. It was obvious to all that it would be an impossible task and resisted by most.

We have our drone/multirotor members fully integrated into MAAC culture following the same rules and safety guidelines as all other members and there are no problems so far. One club I belong to has a sanctioned race course permanently set up on the property with 20 ft high safety netting where needed. The bigger multirotors fly the same as helicopters with no problems.

If the AMA would have adopted the us and them rather than trying to be all inclusive things may have turned out much different for the membership.

I hope they are able to work things out and this virus gets lost so next year I will have the opportunity to continue my flying in the US.

The AMA is the only CBO and organization representing its members I feel it needs to dump the none members and concentrate on securing the best for its membership and let the rest fend for itself. What have the other countries that have secured flying rights for their members done?