Originally Posted by
BarracudaHockey
I'm curious for a change for Franks opinion.
I mean Canadian law says you have to belong to a private, dues collecting (emphasis added) organization to comply with federal law and fly under the recreational exemption (emphasis added).
Originally Posted by
BarracudaHockey
Yes, I want Franks opinion.
One of his incessant points to Congress, the FAA, and anyone else that will listen is that it's illegal to require membership in a private dues collecting organization to use the public air space as a recreational user.
So I'm curious what he thinks of this happening in Canada.
I'm not taking a shot at anyone or organization, I'm just really wondering his thoughts (emphasis added).
I'm kinda shocked you're even asking this, as you know or should know that US laws must comply with the US constitution. Likewise, you know or should know that Canadian law has absolutely zero influence over that. What Canadians do or do not do in their laws has zero bearing on what would be constitutional or not in the US.