RCU Forums - View Single Post - They just can't help themselves
View Single Post
Old 12-30-2022 | 02:04 PM
  #139  
combatpigg's Avatar
combatpigg
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20,448
Received 44 Likes on 40 Posts
From: arlington, WA
Default

Originally Posted by franklin_m
And yet Echo's post would lead one to believe they're still there ... so I went and looked. Interesting what I found. Remember back when everyone was being told by "leaders" to wear masks in restaurants etc.? And then remember how angry we felt when we saw those same "leaders" eating in fancy restaurants without masks? That's called "Mixed Messaging," and it undermines whatever effort you're trying to promote.

With that in mind, the AMA is telling members (or anyone with access to their open websites ... like AMA flight school) to follow the rules. Yet when one goes to these sites, as I did a few minutes ago, what you see is blatant "mixed messaging" that screams "do as I say, not as I do."

Very first link after I clicked on after searching "FPV" on AMA flight school:
https://www.amaflightschool.org/diy/how-fly-fpv
- Start to approx 3 min: Appears to be BLOS, repeated aggressive maneuvering over moving car
- Approx 3:09, drops below cliff down to beach (and clearly BLOS)
- Approx 3:49 after encouraging to watch "professionals" (who likely flying BVLOS), "not even close to the envelope of where you can push your quad..."
- Approx 7:30 when discussing "location" shows flying over moving car AS HE'S TALKING ABOUT NOT BREAKING FAA RULES!

And examples of "mixed messaging" are all over the AMA site. On this link: https://www.amaflightschool.org/gets...model-aircraft
Photo clearly taken from sUAS flying over residential area (in violation of AMA safety code)

Other photo further down taken from over houses, an active road, in densely populated area. More "do as I say, not as I do." If AMA is to be CREDIBLE (and FAA pays attention to details like this God forbid there's ever an incident), AMA needs to scrub each and every web page, each and every linked video on their site to ensure there's no doubt what people see is compliant with AMA and FAA. And if it's a gray area, it should come down. So there's never any question that AMA is doing it right.
If the AMA had our best interests at heart [instead of theirs] they would have explained to the membership that the driving force for many if not most people to fly "drones".... is to fly them with a camera over populated areas....and that the AMA needed to steer clear of promoting / endorsing that mode of flight in order to keep our safety record as clean as it is and to keep the FAA out of our business.
Most people in the USA don't even live within the vicinity of a totally safe area for drone flying...and all the general public knows is that these "planes" are part of our hobby and that our hobby has become part of their national security risk.