You should do your homework first before you start any defamations. Tyler saw the boat with concavity in the back in reallife.
The hull which set the final record 2021 had a straight back without concavity.
And no, i will not post pictures from the bottom as i will not defend any accusation out of nowhere. And for sure i will not feed digital design, do your own homework.
The hull is based on the rules of IMPBA, NAMBA and German SAW.
The Chine is positive angled. Potentially you have some sort of distortion or illusion in your view that the hull is a cathedral design.

And in the end i dont care if you trust it or not.
I suggest you start with with driving, instead of writing. And top at least the NAMBA record from 2014

Regards
Ralf













Hi Exo,

since you are here maybe you can explain a few things about your 1st post here since 2004. Let me first say I'm flattered by the attention.

secondly...

Its suspect what you post. You said to John the chines were angled downward. is that a positive direction? Also every version seen has concavity you suggest there is one without and wont post a photo of a transom why? Its not like we don't have full view of at least 1 version here right?

Thats odd.. just for conversations sake is the depth of the concave versions rules compliant ??? and which is faster of the two..... ?

U say the record boat was not this and a straight V did it have any strakes?

were they measured for compliance?

you dont have to show the bottom of the boat to answer these question I have zero interest in designing anything like that because it looks very illegal and i just want to know was it measured and not just seen. that's isn't quite how the rules work.

protesting a boat hull is a fair part of sanctioned competition you dont have to answer at this moment if you do not want to. But at some point it will have to be answered by the ruler.

was the boat protested at the events yes or no?

Regards
Hubert