In reply to all who questioned the validity of the pictures and video clip on the website at:-

http://www.iadmodeldesigns.co.uk/gcm...20page%201.htm


Some new high quality pictures have been sent to me (full pictures 2.7mb) and cropped to reduce the size down to 94kb have been published at,

http://www.iadmodeldesigns.co.uk/In%...20Pictures.htm


These pictures prove the wing broke in flight, look at the broken leading edge, a fact my supplier Art Hobby and the manufacturer have always denied.

A quote from an email sent to me by Marek Szufa the on behalf of the manufacturer on 25th September:-

“Sir

I thing this is a little to much. I was trying to find some, even just a small evidence that will prove your unbelievable story.”

These pictures do prove it!!!!!!!!!!!

A quote from Wieslaw Piotrowski from an email sent to me on 15thOctober:-

“The characteristic fracture of the left wing was caused by inertial forces
at the moment of collision (the wing broke from the trailing to the leading
edge,

Again the pictures prove this theory totally wrong.

A quote from an email sent to me from Marek Szufa on 24th October:-

“-Why wasn’t the left wing twisted away and did not fell off in the air at the same moment when it experienced your alleged flatter and structural damage. This should happen as a natural consequence of a wing flatter. By the way, if you can find some time to study a little the flatter phenomenon, you will see what is the character of destruction on the wing-suffering flatter.

Why is not there a trace of fracture on the wings, while the model is making a vertical dive in spin, when the top wing surfaces are clearly visible ?”

Well here is the proof of the structural wing failure in flight!!!!! (deny it now!)

Perhaps my supplier Art Hobby and the manufacturer will now accept their responsibility for supplying to me a faulty model which broke up in the air on its first flight.

I doubt it as, to date they have done everything to avoid doing this, let’s see I will keep you informed.


Iain Nicol