Well, curiousity got the best of me and I downloaded that plane. First of all, if you changed the visual scale to 1.0 instead of 2.0 it looks right. The guy made all his changes then just upped the visual scale, which tends to drive all dimensions outward from the middle of the plane. Most folks making a new plane and changing the size of the model make their other dimensions to match. This person didn't...in fact, they made them even smaller. According to the 48" wingspan they have, the visual scale should be set at 0.6. But then he uses a different ratio of gear height and the plane floats a little bit above the runway. So his dimensions no longer match the Cessna model. You're kind of out of luck to get everything perfect. I started messing with the gear heights, but that starts to become a mess and you've changed the landing characteristics. You could double all of the measurements and it would probably look ok, but then might not fly the same. I couldn't come up with a quick fix, and since I wasn't interested in the plane I decided to bag it, sorry. If I were you, I'd fly it at a normal 1.0 scale and just zoom in if you need to see it more closely. Good luck .

Chuck