RCU Forums - View Single Post - G2 vs. Aerofly Pro for non 3D flyers?
View Single Post
Old 01-19-2004 | 05:12 PM
  #3  
spokman
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Spokane, WA
Default RE: G2 vs. Aerofly Pro for non 3D flyers?

I've flown both and G2 has better graphics. You can see the planes clearer farther out. And G2 has some sport planes. AFP Comes with a PT40 and that's it for .40 size planes. Also AFP wouldn't work with my older Airtronics 4 channel radio(late 90's). Tech support did not help me with my problems. AFP also has some sorta odd graphics thing going on where straight lines look a little jagged sometimes. I have a gaming computer with updated drivers so that isn't the prob. As far as flight characteristics go I couldn't really comment as I'm not good flyer. They both fly. If you get AFP I would make sure your tx will work with it or consider the game commander version or getting a cheap 4 channel tx that has a removable chip. I'm not trying to steer you one way or another but I wish I had G2 to use for a while at home to really compare. Flew G2 at the hobby shop and was impressed but AFP is serving my needs well. I will probably be selling AFP at a nice discount as soon as I'm a proficient flyer. Guess I don't want you to just get a one sided story. I never see very many posts from people who have actually flown both.