RCU Forums - View Single Post - G2 vs. Aerofly Pro for non 3D flyers?
View Single Post
Old 01-20-2004 | 12:42 AM
  #9  
serge1's Avatar
serge1
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: DES RUISSEAUXQu颥c, CANADA
Default RE: G2 vs. Aerofly Pro for non 3D flyers?

ORIGINAL: spokman

I've seen both and I'm a gamer also. G2 Beats AFP hands down in the graphics department. My video card is a 128MB Ti4200. : ) Computer runs a Gigabyte KT400 board. Has 512MB Crucial(Micron) DDR RAM. Maxtor 7200 RPM HD. But I am using Nvidias latest drivers. They are WHQL'd but they could be introducing some issues as is the case sometime with video drivers and 3D applications. I don't have anough time with G2 to make a definitive statement about what one is better but I can spot graphics differences very fast.

Its strange how sometimes we differ on something but anyway I respect you opinion. A lot of my friends run the G2 and when they saw AFP running on my computer they all come to the same statement. "Wow the graphics are so better"

I run a G-force 4 (4600) on a 2.4 GHZ 512 MEG.

Make sure you run with the new patch on aerofly who give you the option
to crank up the resolution.

Serge
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ay74835.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	74.7 KB
ID:	92417   Click image for larger version

Name:	Up48188.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	63.9 KB
ID:	92418