ORIGINAL: Tall Paul
It is SO simple to a make a bad flying airplane!
Ignore the c.g. is the easiest and most common method.
Just build it, stuff it full of stuff, and then stuff all the stuff into the ground on the first (and only) flight attempt.
I bet that happens to many ARFs...
hehe, I meant aerodynamically speaking...
This is probably not a nice thing to say, but... I hate ARF's. They take almost as long as a kit to build and I am never satisfied with the finished product.
I know how to CAD and I found a guy willing to laser cut my parts. Airfoil choice is kinda difficult. I have a friend that has a Masters in Aero that helps me some, but I don't like to bother him too much. (not that he'd mind, I just dont't want to wear out my welcome.) And I like to be able to talk intelligently with him. (not look like a dumb***) I was wondering what kind of experiences people have had with blending airfoils and how necessary it is in the model world.
Red B.
So I went about it in reverse? [X(]

That's typical for me.
I am designing an ME 329. It's a flying wing with two pushers that was in development by the germans at the of WW2. Is there a benefit to a blended airfoil in a case like this? Or should I just go with a fully symmetrical airfoil. (it will be powered by .30 to .50 glow four-strokes) pics at
http://www.luft46.com/mess/me329.html