RCU Forums - View Single Post - canards v. forplane
View Single Post
Old 02-04-2004 | 02:59 PM
  #21  
Craig-RCU's Avatar
Craig-RCU
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: minneapolis, MN
Default RE: canards v. forplane

Canard is the French word for "duck." The term canard was not meant to refer to any particular structure of the aircraft. It was originally used to describe the long neck, duck-like look of an airplane with a small lifting surface in front of the main wings. So I would think that foreplane would be the more accurate term to describe a lifting surface that is in front.

This is my Sig Tristar with OS .25fp. It has a flat-plate airfoil foreplane with a chord that measures 5" at the root and 3" at the tip and about 3 degrees incidence (too much incidence in my opinion). It loops in about 10 feet and is very aerobatic. It even does a nice flat spin that recovers immediately after I let go of the sticks. It's ability to flatspin really surprised me since it doesn't have rudder control.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ro41984.jpg
Views:	363
Size:	37.5 KB
ID:	97338