RCU Forums - View Single Post - BALSA is better than SPAD ?
View Single Post
Old 02-18-2004 | 04:25 PM
  #29  
bhole74's Avatar
bhole74
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Anderson, MO
Default RE: BALSA is better than SPAD ?

ORIGINAL: 2MuchThrow

ORIGINAL: JohnW

However, knowing what I know now, I lean toward getting a traditional kit, becasue it teaches basic building techniques, proper plane setup, etc. In some respects I had the best of both worlds when learning to fly... I built a traditional kit but I was also in the air quick with a SPAD.
Bad advice...

If your beginner, what ever you do....do not build a traditional kit. Choose a balsa ARF...

If you build a traditional kit, you will fall in love with your plane, it will take you 5X longer to learn to fly than the guy with the ARF and about 10X longer than the guy with the SPAD. After you learn to fly, than learn to build. Make your second plane a scale warbird to get that out of your system.

I totally disagree with this thought. I have seen too many guys show up with an Alpha and are totally clueless how things work, it was all done for them. My first was a Seniorita, and yes I loved it, still do, still in one piece. I was soloing after just two weekends and advancing to low wing sports models in 6 weeks.