Btw, the reason I perfer analog trims is that I find it easier to trim a plane that is really out of trim. It takes too long to feed in a large trim value with digital trims, at least on the radios I've used, IMHO. But, I also test fly more planes, and many of them are hand-launch combat planes, so trimming in a hurry is something most guys never deal with, but that I do quite a bit.

Most guys do prefer the rocker switch digital trims on flight surfaces. I'm an oddball that way . Throttle trim is a more mixed bag.

Oh, one cool thing that some radios offer on digital trims is the ability to adjust the trim sensitivity. My Polk, for example, has analog-style levers, but is actually a digital trim internally. I can set the trims up to make a "click" more or less sensitive. On really touchy models, where one click can go from too much one way to too much the other, it's really nice to be able to make a "click" result in a smaller servo movement. I'm sure other digital trim radios have this feature, but I've never heard of it on an analog trim radio.

And, it's always worth noting that all radios, and trim levers, still resolve the final servo position in to a series of "steps", either 512 or 1024 from end-to-end. So, if you're wondering if the receiver can tell the difference, it can't, it's all the same to the RX.