RCU Forums - View Single Post - GSP ARFs- Whose Responsible
View Single Post
Old 04-10-2004 | 04:33 PM
  #86  
josephair
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , CA
Default RE: GSP ARFs- Whose Responsible

Daven and stick jammer hit it right on the head with thier comments. Unless an arf is a total pos right out of the box (send that one back), take some time to make the arf better and stronger...why not?? The people that cry and whine are the people too lazy to tweek out the plane.....or they don't know a servo from a wingtip and can't...so whats left to do? ***** and moan.

I have seen EVERY major arf manufacturer get slammed on rcu (and some of those companies give rcu money to adververtise at the same time they are getting slammed...what a joke. I think the companies that don't advertise on rcu have figured this out and don't bother giving rcu money).

Just look around: they have posted Hangar 9 arfs are junk. GP arfs are junk, H9 retracts are junk, DP arfs are junk, GP wings failing in flight, Laniers are garbage, KMPs have probs....etc etc. So ALL MAJOR arf makers produce JUNK??? NOPE. They are all made to a certain standard...as good as they can be in an assemblly line environment and made to be sold at $300 or so.

If you just can't get this concept, stop buying arfs and start building kits....oops I forgot, you are too lazy.


Also, why is this Irwin dude still in business if he is crooked and/or too rude to deal with? Which ones of you are helping him stay in business?